10 Syllogistic arguments for Gods existence

[Deesse23]

So what?
The Cosmos probably consists of an infinite number of universes of whom some are without life, some are without matter, some probably collapsed right after *spawning* (big bang).......and one maybe has matter, dark matter, dark energy and life.

So.fucking.what?

The Multiverse -  reasons, why it's not a good explanation for the existence of our fine-tuned universe.


The task of a multiverse generator
The smallness of the cosmological constant is widely regarded as the single the greatest problem confronting current physics and cosmology. The cosmological constant acts as a repulsive force, causing space to expand and, when negative, acts as an attractive force, causing space to contract. To get our universe, this constant must be right amongst 10^123 possibilities. That means that the probability that our universe contains galaxies is akin to exactly 1 possibility in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 . Unlikely doesn’t even begin to describe these odds. There are “only” 10^81 atoms in the observable universe, after all. Thirty billion years contains only 10^18 seconds. By totaling those, we find that the maximum elementary particle events in 30 billion years could only be 10^143.

Now let's suppose there was a multiverse generator. He would have had to make up to 10^123 attempts to get one universe with the right expansion rate. He would have made 10^18 attempts after 30 billion years.
Once he had that right, to get a universe with atoms, he would have to make the following number of trials:
the right Ratio of Electrons: Protons 1:10^37
Ratio of Electromagnetic Force: Gravity 1:10^40
If a multiverse generator existed, he must have been VERY busy in the last trillion trillion trillion years to get out only our universe......
does that make sense?

You find large numbers maybe impressive, i dont. Maybe its because i am an engineer and you an ignoramus who is easily impressed (as evidenced by your BS writings).

Maybe it needed 1^google universes to make ours.

So.fucking.what

Since space-time only exists some planck time after a big bang and not during universe generation, there is no time for 1^google tries of triggering big bangs. So, as you see, time is of no issue on that level, since it doesnt necessarily exist. Yet i doubt you have the intellectual capacity nor the intellectual honesty to acknowldge this. So by all means, keep bombarding us with large numbers if thats what makes you rock hard. 

---

Yes it is. Any change in the universal ratios is enough to end the universe.
I will provide example on the fragility: The Butterfly Effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

Though English is a second language; thankfully I know enough to get me by

Cheers to you too

Butterlfy effect has absofuckinglutely nothing to do with fine tuning and likelihood of physical constants.

Please stop reading fairy tales (like your holy book) and educate yourself (properly).

---

The Multiverse -  reasons, why it's not a good explanation for the existence of our fine-tuned universe.

Question begging in the title. Thats all we need to know about your argument.