RE: 10 Syllogistic arguments for Gods existence
January 10, 2020 at 2:49 am
(This post was last modified: January 10, 2020 at 2:53 am by Deesse23.)
(January 9, 2020 at 6:03 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote:(January 8, 2020 at 3:02 am)Deesse23 Wrote: For the second time: No it does not!
It has nothing to do with the effects on our universe by changing fundamenal constants. It has nothing to do with the *fragility* (whatever you mean by that) of our reality. Our reality is actually pretty stable, for some 14bio years now.
What the butterfly effect shows is the effects by changing the starting conditions of complex, nonlinear systems (= our reality). The preconditions are changed, and the system is given. What you are referring to is changing the (behaviour of the) system itself, not the preconditions. Thats fundamentally not the same
Applying the butterfly effect on the universe would rather be something like: Adding more (Or less) mass, or temperature, or whatever, with the fundamental laws of phsics being the same.
Changing fundamental constants =!= changing preconditions
Matter in fact; there is a time when a second big bang might occur -according the theory of The Big Crunch-:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch
Actually if our deeds do affect the world, then they would also affect how the next big bang would happen: its magnitude, its productions too.
Making our deeds changing for our future.
If you read again what both of us wrote, then you´ll notice that your response is completely irrelevant to my objections. Imho this is your silent admission that you were wrong (we all are sometimes), but i would have prefferred you say: thanks for the correction.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse