(March 13, 2020 at 1:01 pm)Drich Wrote:(March 11, 2020 at 11:14 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Lol, it’s cute (scary) how Drich thinks he wins debates here.
![]()
if providing three points of reference against a personal attack is loosing a debate in your mind... then there is nothing i can help you with
Your three points of reference do not support your argument.
#1. Josephus is of dubious authenticity and Tacitus merely observed that christians existed.
#2. Flat out states that "Here we mostly rely on the four Gospels." as it's evidence. Ignoring the fact that nobody has a clue who wrote them
#3. States that the available manuscripts are a whole fucking century after the supposed jebus.
Now, I personally have no problem with the notion of a historical jebus. Why not? The levant at the time was chock full of apocalyptic prophets. What's one more? I could list many others that have far more evidence for their historicity. But you don't believe any of those messiah claimants that have better evidence, do you? Why not?