which version of christianity is correct?

[Drich]

Wow drick, you're so clever. However do you do it?

it's easy really. you google a subject and when you find something interesting you build a subject around this little know fact and support it unknowingly (to them) with tertiary sources at first then make mention to stronger secondary point at which point the fool hardy will think you are arguing your own brand of BS like they are and they will go all in. at which point you reveal the bed of nails you trapped them in and have them over commit themselves.. then you dump in 3 or more credentialed citable sources to really make them impale themselves on the facts the were originally pooping over. Then watch them squirm as they call you names for outwitting them over and over again. It always best to have 5 or more on the line when you bang out a real reveal. Biggest thing, be truthful even if the subject is sensational and begs for more. stay true to the facts as they will be enough.

Then repeat as many times as you can

---

the list says:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Co...anuscripts

now what did you say? You thought only the papyri existed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_asNhzXq72w

don't try and play it off. everything you said was/is documented. you did a quick google search, having no back ground in hermeneutics you clearly have no understanding of the source material, and you went with a number and a word you thought to be representative of what you have been told.

---

What do you think the earliest sources are of the New Testament?  Please be specific.  In fact, just name a single source or document.

Lets put some of these other subject to bed first. you are spanning 3 different Manuscript subjects.

1You made the assertion that the papyri were the only manuscripts of the NT
Is this true yes or no and do you understand now that the papyri are not the only form of hand written manuscript?

2 the subject matter of the usage and age was open ignoring your first mistake. We need to close the matter of your first mistake before we go in to the second and now this third

3 the third being is you are now asking for source material of the NT..

Again you clearly do not have an understand of this material either otherwise the question would be different. here you assume one complete source.

not the case the NT has several sources. these sources are called codices. they are a collection of manuscripts from across the spectrum of avaible manuscripts. Some are selected for age others clarity other still preuvenuance. there are several different codacees based on which translation IE which NT version you are reading from.

If you want to discuss this new subject put the first 2 to bed be conceding where you were misinformed.

---

Wow drick, you're so clever. However do you do it?

watch im doing it again with jeneha above..