RE: falsifying the idea of falsification
March 26, 2020 at 11:54 am
(This post was last modified: March 26, 2020 at 12:01 pm by Drich.)
(March 25, 2020 at 2:35 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: But falsification is STILL only used in a scientific context. It’s original point was and still is to separate science from non-science.
If you make the statement ‘God exists’ and I can’t falsify it, it doesn’t mean that the statement is or isn’t true, it simply means that it is not a scientific statement and not amenable to scientific investigation.
I should think this would delight you.
Boru
it does as the God exists statement is based in theology.
one of the final straws on the other forum was the use of falsification as a means to dismiss the intellectual merrit of a theological dicussion as it was not a matter of science. the assumption being that only science or what science could discern could be considered truth or fact.
the point of the video is to show that science is a very limited discipline or field of study, and just because something can not be quantified by science does not mean it can be disregaurded.
(March 25, 2020 at 2:53 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: Killing trillions?
Considering there isn't ONE trillion people on the globe (no yet - but if the RCC and other such droolbags have their way - there soon will be) we can assume the rest of your post to be non-factual as well.
Ignore engaged.
trillions of health lung cells causing scar tissue to form and difficult breathing which if combined with another pre existing condition could cause death of those infected in this pandemic.
Point being your perception is not always mine. this doesn't make you wrong or me right till you assume you think you have a full understanding of everything being said.
(March 25, 2020 at 6:21 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: So much spam. Whats the point of posting anything you refuse to discuss?
what am i refusing to discuss?
