Last Non-winter

[onlinebiker]

When you burn the fuel you created the pollutants in the air are the same WITH THE ADDITION of the pollution from the fuel you used to build fuel.

No you don't get it that's not the case

---

I really don't get this, recycling works.  Sometimes the programs are expensive..but they do work.

Pop control won't reduce demand for something - less than 1% of us account for the majority of demand for anything.  For "things" in the aggregate, resource distribution and consumption is unfair, with a larger but still vanishingly small portion of the world population consuming the lions share of everything produced.

No kidding 

You think this would be a no brainer

Of course someone with no brain would think so.


What accounts for the majority of our atmospheric pollution?

Agriculture. And remember to add all the peripheries involved. The fuels burnt in growing, harvesting, distributing, preparing, storing, using and then disposing of food.

1% of the people eat more than half the food?

Huh... Who knew?

.....

Reducing population would directly reduce our food demand and have a huge impact on environmental quality.


You have to be a religious fanatic to think otherwise... Gotta breed lotsa faithful droolers huh?

---

You don't mine smog for recycled fuel but carbon from the air, and carbon in the air is in same quantities all over the world.

You better go tell NASA that they're wrong - and they should just quit mapping the levels.....

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images...on-dioxide