(April 5, 2020 at 8:00 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote:True food is no different then anything else . His fallacy remains invalid regardless of product . Population reduction does not by necessity coralate to a reduction in consumption .As i provided countless links directly demonstrating this flawed assumption.(April 4, 2020 at 9:37 am)onlinebiker Wrote: Of course someone with no brain would think so.I think that you should take a look. The numbers for food distribution are just as grim as any other product.
What accounts for the majority of our atmospheric pollution?
Agriculture. And remember to add all the peripheries involved. The fuels burnt in growing, harvesting, distributing, preparing, storing, using and then disposing of food.
1% of the people eat more than half the food?
Huh... Who knew?
.....
Reducing population would directly reduce our food demand and have a huge impact on environmental quality.
You have to be a religious fanatic to think otherwise... Gotta breed lotsa faithful droolers huh?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM