(April 6, 2020 at 11:27 am)SUNGULA Wrote:look again dummy i have posted an article and a court ruling from 2018 which states that eyewitness testimony is still considered to be primary evidence source. Meaning if you get 2 or 3 people together to say a man is not guilty and you have 3 other items says he is the he will most likely be set free.Quote:again despite what you personally feel here are couple of examples of eyewitness testimony ability to ensure a conviction or even exonerate. there are even examples where DNA convicts, but eyewitnesses place the suspect out of the realm of possible suspects.Yup one article against decades of research
clearwatercriminallawyer.net/florida-court-of-appeals-affirms-eyewitness-testimony-is-sufficient-evidence-to-support-a-conviction-for-a-crime/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...you-think/
I all comes down to how it is collected and the circumstance/stress.
Your 'research' only ever looks at one sided testimony. when testimony is used to identify an innocent person it is almost never over turned.
not only that 25% of the guilty can be argued as being accurate. so putting the two percentages together eye witness testimony has a 75% accuracy rating. There are even examples of eye witness testimony over turning police obtained confessions. IE the cops stress s dude into a guilty plea but dude was out on a party boat with 5 other people or something along those lines.. Still the point is when you look at the whole picture (think for yourself and not let a biased article tell what to think) you will look at the other side of eyewitness testimony and see it is almost 100% reliable if done in the right way.
So all this aside are you now past the idea that eye witness testimony is not hear say? Do you finally concede youve learned something?
Quote:Nope you present an account and that's all .It's not his job to refute it , And we hae no reason to follow said instructions .duh... good at point out the obvious? no one has any reason to follow God's instructions unless they want absolute proof of God.
So if you or whom ever you are speaking of in the 3rd person seeks proof of God here are the instructions to find him. if you are not then fine. all i am saying is at this point unless you have proof of me lying, you can not call me a lair simply because you do not want to believe what i have said.
I provided proof. you are the judge of it. if you want to be fair and know the truth i have provided a theologically sound way to discern the truth of this theological matter. no other intellectual discipline is capable to discern this matter as it has not the tools to account for all the variables in theology.
So again here is the proof in my eye witness account and i can provide you with the step by step want to see for yourself and verify if what i said is true.