angel story video form

[The Architect Of Fate]

h... good at point out the obvious? no one has any reason to follow God's instructions unless they want absolute proof of God.

Or don't have any seriouis reason to think it will work or there gods instructions

So if you or whom ever you are speaking of in the 3rd person seeks proof of God here are the instructions to find him.

Or they have no reason to accept the instruction are accurate and thus have no reason to follow them 

if you are not then fine.

Or you have no reason to accept the instruction are accurate and thus have no reason to follow them 

all i am saying is at this point unless you have proof of me lying, you can not call me a lair simply because you do not want to believe what i have said.

Nope we can disbelieve you without proving your lying and are completely justified in doing so.

I provided proof. you are the judge of it

No you have not you have provided claims not proof 

 if you want to be fair and know the truth i have provided a theologically sound way to discern the truth of this theological matter.

Not accepting your claims is more then fair and is truthful till shown otherwise .You have provided no proof you have provided a bunch of theological claims nothing more 

no other intellectual discipline is capable to discern this matter as it has not the tools to account for all the variables in theology.

Too bad it isn't an intellectual discipline and no other discipline needs to account for theologies claims .Because theology is itself just a bunch of claims.

So again here is the proof in my eye witness account and i can provide you with the step by step want to see for yourself and verify if what i said is true.

So no proof then and no reason to accept your claims . As i said .

---

So to sum up 

1. Dirch makes a bunch of claims and claims on top of those claims and calls it proof 

2. Demands we prove what he's claiming is not the case .Despite us having no such epistemic obligation.