(October 26, 2011 at 7:38 pm)Rhythm Wrote: So human musicians don't use tracks of rain hitting the roof now eh? The actual definition doesn't suit your argument, it's hard to bullshit people with it, so you argue against it, round and round we go.
Give me a break; just because a musician may use a sound of nature in their music it does not automatically make the sound of nature music. You are reaching on that one. Why don’t you tape of video of yourself pouring water on a roof and send it to Juilliad’s school of music and see how excited they are to sign you up. Lol.
(October 26, 2011 at 7:43 pm)Shell B Wrote: Animals make music in the same fashion humans make music. The only difference is that their only instrument is their voice.
What distinguishes human music from other sounds is it is an art form. It is designed to invoke a particular reaction, emotion, or interpretation by the listener. So a bird's mating call could be considered music in a generic sense, but not as an art form. Only humans produce artistic music.
