(October 26, 2011 at 8:25 pm)Rhythm Wrote: It wouldnt be the first case, as has already been pointed out to you, but how does that help you bullshit people? Oh, right, it doesn't.
Oh you mean you asserting it? Yeah I kind of just ignored that because it was not backed up with anything.
Quote: I'm going to ask this again..have you been reading "Signature in the Cell"?
Where did you ask that the first time? I have that book yes, it’s a pretty good one, I have not read all of it because it’s over 500 pages.
(October 26, 2011 at 8:26 pm)Shell B Wrote: No, I was saying they are unbiased. Thank you for arguing my argument for me.
If that’s what you were trying to argue then I missed it. It sounded to me like you were saying the people were so smart at the Smithsonian that they couldn’t possibly be wrong on evolution. They are extremely biased though, after Meyer’s article was published the editor lost his job for publishing it even though he and the other reviewers felt it passed the merits test. Science isn’t about merits anymore, it’s about censorship.
Quote: Tell me where you got that Cannibal Corpse statistic. I saw Cannibal Corpse at the Palladium not too long ago. There were quite a few women there. I would say closer to 50% than 5%.
I was just estimating judging by their concert videos. Looks like a total sausage fest to me. You could pick another band though as an example if you’d like, there are plenty of male bands out there that do not draw large female crowds.
