RE: St. Louis attorneys draw down on protestors passing by.
June 30, 2020 at 3:15 pm
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2020 at 3:18 pm by arewethereyet.)
(June 30, 2020 at 3:05 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:(June 30, 2020 at 2:59 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Is it also illegal to - on your own property - point a firearm at someone who has threatened to kill you and burn your house to the ground?Who did that? I know they claim that but I don't know who did that. I do doubt those claims.
Boru
They also said that the protestors threatened to kill their dog.
Is there proof of that? Probably not.
(June 30, 2020 at 3:15 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(June 30, 2020 at 3:09 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: They won't produce any good evidence that THEIR property was at risk, or that any other property was at risk. So they will be making an unsupported claim of lawful use of force.
"Shoot first" is white privilege.
We live in a nation where a black female EMT gets shot 9 times in a no knock warrant.
We can't vilify a "Country Club Hero" who sports an assault rifle while wearing beige pants and collared shirt. He was just protecting his whiteness. I mean, can you imagine the entry fees for his club if he doesn't defend his turf?
Just try to use a fact now and then.
She was shot 8 times.
You pass on bogus information more than Trump does. I know, I know...it's your ADHD and your laziness but it's still incorrect.
“If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius
