(July 15, 2020 at 8:06 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(July 15, 2020 at 7:11 am)WinterHold Wrote: then, how?
The details of the voting are a nunya.
"Nunya" means "non of your business"; so the reader can understand.
Quote:But if the final decision were left to an administrator, irrespective of the voting, then AF WOULD be a dictatorship.
But above the "mod"s' decision and voting; an Admin decision must be made too based on a voting between the Admins themselves. i.e your mod statue only gives you the right to vote for such a thing in the first place.
Quote:By way of example, the warnings you’ve received were decided by a majority vote. It has never happened (as far as I’m aware) that an admin has issued a warning when the vote went the other way.
Personally, I think it's unethical to tell the details of such things -as warning- publicly.
Quote:It’ll be the same with a decision on a Human Rights section of the Forum. You seem to think that if all mods and all admins but one voted against the new section, the lone holdout would approve the section and it would be created. Doesn’t work that way.
https://atheistforums.org/thread-61293-p...pid1988166
please see my comment that discussed this issue.
