The Moral Obligation to Choose the Lesser Evil

[arewethereyet]

We are presented with three choices:

1 - A horrific, awful one who will surely do more damage to the country and its people, some of which will take years, if ever, to overcome.

2 - The choice we were given by the other party who hopefully won't do more damage but will probably not be able to fix much, if anything...perhaps he can slow the collapse. Stem the bleeding, as it were.

3 - The throw away vote that will almost certainly benefit #1.

Too many people went with #3 last time and that helped create this shitshow.