(November 15, 2020 at 4:33 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote:Not to mention not all gods are creator gods(November 15, 2020 at 4:09 pm)Sound Of Reason Wrote: Definition of terms => WCE = Whatever created everything.
God is just a name of WCE.
God cannot be a name for whatever created the universe if it takes a whoever to satisfy the requirements of godhood.
Goes like this...
-God is "x"
here's an x
-not a god.
Then god is not x after all. More properly, including your silent premise
-a god is a whoever, that created the universe. Not whatever created the universe. Toasters need not apply. If a toaster could create a universe (a premise which you reject assuming that this is a point of contention), it would not be a god. Is that a fair and accurate summary of your requirements for godhood?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM