(January 16, 2021 at 3:24 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:If a person suffered a fatal result of a health condition due to the stress of the situation or due to the situation delaying timely help from arriving then it's part of the body count.(January 16, 2021 at 9:12 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: 1. Not exactly.
2. So, a count of three makes an insurrection more acceptable to you than a count of five?
Boru
Do you HAVE to play the either/or game?
Just because I want accurate reporting - and find the media's treatment of this event biased - does not mean I favor the idiots in question.
This "protest" was a stupid idea implemented by stupid people.
I don't trust what the media says all the time - just like I don't trust what Trump and his ilk spews.
When they start inflating shit like body counts I trust them even less.
The fact that you don't like the body count doesn't mean shit.
You only want to count who got shot.
I have read that the cop who died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher may have actually died from something other than that blunt force trauma. So I guess according to your way of counting...he didn't die because of the insurrection either.
Ever heard of collateral damage?
Just because a death wasn't intentional doesn't mean it wasn't part of it.
Jesus Fuck you need an attitude adjustment.
“If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius
