(March 9, 2021 at 8:00 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:(March 9, 2021 at 7:50 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: I looked up man and one of the definitions is an adult male human. Male is a sex. I don't think biologists and doctors are being ignorant bigots by using different language than we choose to use when we say that men can get pregnant.Any definition of gender that excludes trans identities is bigotry full stop.
If you call this person man you're a bigot end of story and you will rightly be ridiculed for it. Because this is a women's end of story. You don't get to use your definition to define her because your definition is wrong. It's not semantic. THIS IS A WOMEN!
(March 9, 2021 at 8:00 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: You've swallowed another load of horseshit from the usual suspects, man. I think that you should man up and stop that.Remember this is the same person who bought the white replacement theory
It's not my definition. It's one of the dictionaries definitions, which some doctors, biologists, professors, etc choose to use. I accept that that is a woman. But's they're also a biological male, and that can't be changed. They are both a woman and male at the same time. Some are referring to gender when they say man. Some are referring to sex. I want them to feel comfortable and if they feel they have more of a feminine brain, that's good enough for me to consider them a woman, but who the hell am I to force my language on a doctor or a biologist?