RE: Belief in white Jesus linked to racism
March 25, 2021 at 8:41 am
(This post was last modified: March 25, 2021 at 8:50 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Depends on the timeframe. Judaism is a bit further along in it's development than, say, christianity. They hit on the realization that the narratives are metaphor sooner. They've been trying to explain that to christians for quite some time, but you know how those guys are when it comes to insisting that jewish people got jewish myths all wrong.
To answer your question, multiple instances. Psalms has a concentration of them. In fact, you could just search the terms leviathan and behemoth to find any of them - and that's precisely because the dragon was almost exclusively used in the context of asserting their gods existence, power, dominion, and primacy. They stand out as prime examples of thematically canaanite elements in jewish mythology. Harkening back (and intentionally so) to the types of beliefs and myths that they had only recently diverged from as fresh henotheists asserting a disparate origin and establishment for their sub-culture.
The thing that I, personally, find super interesting about it, is the line between metaphor and truth in many of our discussions. We use metaphors precisely because we think that the truth of the one can buttress the other as truth. Even more specifically, how the truth on one or the other side of the line may be more important - and the ways that we've damaged that line-side truth by servicing and maintaining the superstitious line-side to it's detriment. Can we safely posit that these dragons are the primordial forces of chaos, land and sea, and do double duty as the enemies of their people (also conceived of as agents of chaos, for what it's worth) - and can we guess that the expressions are myth braking narrative. I think so, yes, and the reason that they felt compelled to tell -those- truths with a story about a dragon boiled down to beliefs they held or their audience held about dragons. Common, not at all seen to be ludicrous or ignorant beliefs, at the time. So, for them, as with any other metaphor today, the truth of one set seemed to express the truth of the other.
It wasn't either/or it was and. Dragons are awesome and powerful - and my god can make them, and my god can compel them to do it's bidding, and my god can destroy them. You think that your god can do all of this, but you're wrong - it was my god that did all of that.
To answer your question, multiple instances. Psalms has a concentration of them. In fact, you could just search the terms leviathan and behemoth to find any of them - and that's precisely because the dragon was almost exclusively used in the context of asserting their gods existence, power, dominion, and primacy. They stand out as prime examples of thematically canaanite elements in jewish mythology. Harkening back (and intentionally so) to the types of beliefs and myths that they had only recently diverged from as fresh henotheists asserting a disparate origin and establishment for their sub-culture.
The thing that I, personally, find super interesting about it, is the line between metaphor and truth in many of our discussions. We use metaphors precisely because we think that the truth of the one can buttress the other as truth. Even more specifically, how the truth on one or the other side of the line may be more important - and the ways that we've damaged that line-side truth by servicing and maintaining the superstitious line-side to it's detriment. Can we safely posit that these dragons are the primordial forces of chaos, land and sea, and do double duty as the enemies of their people (also conceived of as agents of chaos, for what it's worth) - and can we guess that the expressions are myth braking narrative. I think so, yes, and the reason that they felt compelled to tell -those- truths with a story about a dragon boiled down to beliefs they held or their audience held about dragons. Common, not at all seen to be ludicrous or ignorant beliefs, at the time. So, for them, as with any other metaphor today, the truth of one set seemed to express the truth of the other.
It wasn't either/or it was and. Dragons are awesome and powerful - and my god can make them, and my god can compel them to do it's bidding, and my god can destroy them. You think that your god can do all of this, but you're wrong - it was my god that did all of that.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
