(June 4, 2021 at 11:27 am)Astreja Wrote:(June 4, 2021 at 9:56 am)SUNGULA Wrote: No one has the right to someone else's body or to live within it or to use its resources against the will of that person.
This. This x ∞.
No exceptions. Ever.
So... 2) no rights, is the answer?
If the baby were taken out of womb at 24 weeks (alive & well), the Virginia governor/doctor believes (he's on record and apparently unopposed) it's ok to leave it
"on the table, and let nature take it's course." After consulting w/ mom of course...no mention of dad.
Meaning...the placenta is also removed along w/ the fetus/baby and the cord won't be cut. The baby/fetus would eventually run out of air and suffocate.
Less painful than being removed piece by piece, but same end result.
So, what's different than taking a life of any child, by anyone? A thin wall of tissue, and a choice?
Can we extend that "choice" to the "born" child? I mean, if a child is "living off you" materially, that can also be an "inconvenience & liability". Qui?
"....leave it in it's room, and let nature take it's course" ...so to speak. You see where this is going...and it's ugly!
You see, there is no difference.... except, the law can protect what is "deemed" born. So, mom's are the judge. Not science. Not law. Not fathers.
And that is the ultimate Truth.
Quis ut Deus?
