I clearly demonstrated at least two numbered points were they were both similar enough to evaluate. Occams razor and reducing an argument to manageable points isn’t a fallacy. Continue your red herring. Those two points were enough to get them arrested. I don’t claim that they’re the same, I claim that they’re both equally at least meeting a stupid threshold that got them arrested. Your position is what? I assume that there is enough differences to invalidate one arrest? BS
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari