Is Christianity Inherently Supportive Of Slavery And Misogyny?

[The Architect Of Fate]

1.  In the family context,  treating people well and protecting them aren't all that different.  Silly to split hairs on that.

Nope merely protecting someone is not treating people well 

2.  Again, talking about family situation there, regarding the intermixing. Obviously.

Nope wrong 

3.  Why should an 80-year-old woman need financial support?  Hmm. Let's think.

So simply support them 

4.  I guess what atheism and Marxism have in common is atheism.

Not all Marxist were atheists nor does Marxism require atheism if you take it purely as an economic idea 

5.  1839 was well ahead of the seminal Lincoln Douglas debates and nearly a quarter century before Emancipation Proclamation.  Good job Vatican!!

Still well behind England 

6.  Glad you agree biblical slavery was vastly different from modern colonial slavery. 

Yup and it was just as evil

7.  What's bad about sex outside marriage?  Nothing, if you like broken relationships, implying a commitment that doesn't exist,  fatherless children, children who fall into crime, poor single motherhood, women carrying an oversized burden, and perpetuation of more of the same.  Hey guys,  these time-honored God rules are there for a reason.  They WORK.

None of those things are an inherent consequence of sex outside of marriage more bad ideas we as a society have about family structure and the nature of relationships which are outdated, And no god put family structures in place and they have only worked because of social enforcement not as a feature of the structure itself.