(February 16, 2022 at 7:26 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:(February 16, 2022 at 1:17 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: If it’s “not fair” for trans women to participate in women’s athletics because of their natural physical advantages, then why is it fair for, say, a biological female who happens to fall naturally outside of, and above the athletic physical abilities of the average biological female to participate in women’s athletics? I’m not making an argument or talking about Michael Phelps. I’m asking you to defend your reasoning.
Because that woman is not cheating like trans women are. Let's take Serena Williams for example. Physical freaks of nature like her are great for the sport. Great for ratings. Serena Williams remains a part of the women's leagues because she's not good enough to play with the men. If you let trans women play with bio women, by that logic, regular old cis men should also get to go against the bio women, because by your logic, it's not cheating if their bodies are just biologically superior, right? Michael Phelps exists and Shaq exists, and they have an unfair advantage against the other men, so therefore by your logic, any man should be allowed to join a women's league, because natural advantage is irrelevant, right? That's where your whole argument falls apart. If you let in trans women, you should have to let in any old cis man as well, and it ceases to be a women's league, and women are no longer making money and getting endorsements and scholarships and attention.
You have proven many times over that you are a dipshit of mammoth proportions.
Just STFU and find another forum to infest.
You seem to think we don't see you arguing both sides.
You suck as the edgelord you try to be.
I'm your huckleberry.
