(November 11, 2022 at 6:46 am)Jehanne Wrote:(November 11, 2022 at 5:18 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Funny, I can't find a post where I said what you quoted me as saying...
Boru
You stated, "It’s a literary criticism, not an historic one." All the canonical Gospels, along with the Gospel of Thomas, are historical documents, in that they contain historical truths about Jesus of Nazareth, a human being. The mid 2nd-century non-canonical Gospels are literary documents, in that they do not contain historical information about Jesus.
‘Criticism’ and ‘conclusion’ are not the same word. That’s why they’re spelled differently.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax