(November 11, 2022 at 12:27 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(November 11, 2022 at 6:46 am)Jehanne Wrote: You stated, "It’s a literary criticism, not an historic one." All the canonical Gospels, along with the Gospel of Thomas, are historical documents, in that they contain historical truths about Jesus of Nazareth, a human being. The mid 2nd-century non-canonical Gospels are literary documents, in that they do not contain historical information about Jesus.
‘Criticism’ and ‘conclusion’ are not the same word. That’s why they’re spelled differently.
Boru
I would disagree. In conducting historical criticism one is also drawing historical conclusions.