Bacha Bazi: how poor Afghani boys were raped.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

As mentioned above, DynCorp contractors are not US soldiers. Also, the article makes no mention of the practice being ‘widespread’.

Anything else?

Boru

This line is what's important:

[/url]

Afghan Interior Minister Mohammad Hanif Atmar requested that the U.S. military assume control over DynCorp training centres in response, but the U.S. embassy claimed that this was not "legally possible under the DynCorp contract".

It seems to me that the U.S was protecting pedophilia camps by its allies.

This line from the same article is strange; too:

In 2015, The New York Times reported that U.S. soldiers serving in Afghanistan were instructed by their commanders to ignore child sexual abuse being carried out by Afghan security forces, except "when rape is being used as a weapon of war". American soldiers have been instructed not to intervene—in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases, according to interviews and court records. But the U.S. soldiers have been increasingly troubled that instead of weeding out pedophiles, the U.S. military was arming them against the Taliban and placing them as the police commanders of villages—and doing little when they began abusing children.[15][30]

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi#cite_note-30]
Looks like the western forces were the protector of pedophiles, and the Taliban extremism against women contribute to the creation of pedophiles.

So, no evidence of the widespread rape of underage boys by members of the US military, then. I thought as much.

Boru