RE: Is it possible that the universe could be eternal??...
December 30, 2022 at 9:56 am
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2022 at 10:17 am by arewethereyet.)
(December 30, 2022 at 8:21 am)Authari Wrote:Physical cosmologists who have commented on the book have generally dismissed it. In particular, American astrophysicist and cosmologist Edward L. Wright criticized Lerner for making errors of fact and interpretation, arguing that:(December 30, 2022 at 7:58 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: Science cares about the evidence in support of the idea, it doesn’t care who it is that came up with the idea.
I'm just going to leave this video here for you, he's the Chief Scientist of LP Fusion and he and almost 250 other scientists have signed a petition asserting that The Big Bang Theory is false. (of which he is the person at the helm deconstructing the Big Bang Theory, think of him like the Richard Dawkins of The Big Bang Theory, if the BBT were Religion... which it is.
Administrator Notice
Link removed per 30/30 rule.
- Lerner's alternative model for Hubble's Law is dynamically unstable
- the number density of distant radio sources falsifies Lerner's explanation for the cosmic microwave background
- Lerner's explanation that the helium abundance is due to stellar nucleosynthesis fails because of the small observed abundance of heavier elements
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse