(December 30, 2022 at 10:16 am)Authari Wrote:(December 30, 2022 at 9:56 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Physical cosmologists who have commented on the book have generally dismissed it. In particular, American astrophysicist and cosmologist Edward L. Wright criticized Lerner for making errors of fact and interpretation, arguing that:
- Lerner's alternative model for Hubble's Law is dynamically unstable
- the number density of distant radio sources falsifies Lerner's explanation for the cosmic microwave background
- Lerner's explanation that the helium abundance is due to stellar nucleosynthesis fails because of the small observed abundance of heavier elements
Made a response to this that wasn't posted. Strange
There's a spam filter that occasionally grabs posts that aren't spam. The error is usually quickly corrected, but I don't know what the procedure is.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)