(May 19, 2023 at 10:15 am)Angrboda Wrote:(May 19, 2023 at 10:05 am)KerimF Wrote: Sorry for not being clearer. I am talking about trusting another person as you trust yourself.
Obviously, if someone cannot trust himself, 'trusting another person' should have no meaning at all to him.
I don't trust myself in all things, either. But it becomes a bit of an incoherent standard as I cannot decide to exclude myself from some things as I would a friend, so it's not clear how a friendship could ever meet such a bar if for no other reason than that trust in myself is categorically different from trust in another.
Let us return to basics.
My point is that if... I said if... two persons are able to have an unlimited mutual trust, they are no more seen by an outsider as two persons but just One being having One will no matter to whom (of the two) he tries to contact.