Dr. Bill Craig's Debates: Why do Atheists lose/run away from debating him?

[The Architect Of Fate]

1. Craig is good at debate (convincing stupid people he's smart and bamboozling the ignorant ) however all his arguments have been picked apart over and over so why bother debating him about it? he's really good at sophistry and weasel wording his way out and little else. And pointing to one atheist's opinion on how Hitchens did is poor evidence of anything just because that person is an atheist doesn't mean they were right about how well he did.  


2. Dawkins made it clear he won't debate Craig on moral grounds and I agree he shouldn't debate such a loathsome person. That's not running away. Dawkins doesn't owe Craig a debate. No one owes Craig a debate. It's not a good look according to who? I'm perfectly fine with Dawkins not wasting his time playing Craigs word games  


3. Lee Strobel was never an atheist all his accounts sound completely made up to appeal to a Christain audience. And we only have Strobels claims about these supposed converts. That's hardly evidence of anything considering his total lack of credibility.


4. Atheists are not afraid of Craig we know all his tricks and know better than to play his games. It's a case of the best way to win is not to play in the first place. His ideas can be refuted without giving him his soapbox and a chance to do his apologist razzle-dazzle.

So you wasted our time with another pointless rant.