(January 8, 2024 at 9:42 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Why should there be only one ‘necessarily existent being’? Why not two of them? Why not a zillion?
Even more difficult for the argument: why would ANY being necessarily exist? For all we know, the existence of every being is contingent on the existence of every other being.
Boru
Well, for one thing, Ockham's Razor would seem to "shave off" the necessity of postulating more than one.