(July 1, 2024 at 8:52 am)Disagreeable Wrote: It seems that it's never gonna be rational to start a nuclear war. But maybe we should worry about irrationality.
Or maybe non-rational*
\' Wrote: That's actually very helpful. I don't really disagree with most of that (of course I come to a different conclusion). One critical thing however that you and many others in the thread are not being precise on:
Beliefs are either rational, irrational, or non-rational (or nonrational).
Rational Beliefs
A belief is considered rational if it is based on reason, logic, and evidence. Rational beliefs are formed through a process that aligns with principles of logical reasoning and critical thinking. They are typically supported by empirical data, coherent arguments, and a systematic approach to understanding the world.
Irrational Beliefs
A belief is deemed irrational if it goes against reason, logic, or established evidence. Irrational beliefs are characterized by a lack of coherence, logical fallacies, or an outright contradiction of known facts. These beliefs are often formed through emotional bias, wishful thinking, or misinformation.
Non-Rational Beliefs
A belief that is not rationally based is not necessarily irrational. This category of beliefs can be referred to as non-rational. Non-rational beliefs may not stem from logical reasoning or empirical evidence, but they do not necessarily contradict reason or evidence either. Here are some key points about non-rational beliefs:
Faith and Intuition: Many religious or spiritual beliefs fall into the non-rational category. These beliefs are often based on faith, tradition, or intuition rather than empirical evidence or logical deduction. For example, belief in the existence of God may be based on personal faith or spiritual experiences, which are not empirically verifiable but are also not inherently contradictory to reason.
Cultural and Personal Values: Beliefs based on cultural norms, personal values, or ethical principles may also be non-rational. These beliefs are often shaped by upbringing, societal influences, and personal experiences. For example, valuing human rights and equality may not be strictly rational in an empirical sense but is deeply rooted in cultural and ethical contexts.
Practical Rationality: Some beliefs are adopted because they are pragmatically useful or beneficial, even if they lack strong rational foundations. For example, believing in the effectiveness of a placebo treatment might not be rationally justified by the treatment's actual efficacy but can still produce real, positive effects due to the placebo effect.
Why Non-Rational Beliefs Are Not Irrational
Non-rational beliefs are not irrational because they do not necessarily involve contradictions, logical fallacies, or a disregard for evidence. Instead, they operate in domains where empirical evidence and logical reasoning may not fully apply or be relevant. These beliefs can coexist with rational beliefs and can be meaningful and coherent within their own contexts.
Example
Consider the belief in the afterlife. This belief is not supported by empirical evidence and cannot be proven or disproven through scientific means. However, it is not irrational because it does not inherently contradict known facts or logic. It is a non-rational belief rooted in faith, tradition, and personal or cultural significance.