Oh ok, let's have a look at your new reasons.
1. As I said, I never used that logic, though if you believe the Bible is literally the word of God, only one thing would need to be wrong to invalidate that theory, surely?
2. Assuming that I would not respond to evidence, which is you projecting your own opinions onto my character with no just cause, which I resent. On what basis do you claim that it wouldn't matter anyway? You don't have nearly enough information to make that claim.
3. It might be lazy to JUST do that, but since I've been shredding you to pieces in addition to providing a link, I think it's ok to refer to external material. On top of that, for the third time, Minimalist has provided you with something in the other thread to respond to, which you have ignored, and continue to ignore.
Not blown away by your revised reasons, dickhead. Anything else?
1. As I said, I never used that logic, though if you believe the Bible is literally the word of God, only one thing would need to be wrong to invalidate that theory, surely?
2. Assuming that I would not respond to evidence, which is you projecting your own opinions onto my character with no just cause, which I resent. On what basis do you claim that it wouldn't matter anyway? You don't have nearly enough information to make that claim.
3. It might be lazy to JUST do that, but since I've been shredding you to pieces in addition to providing a link, I think it's ok to refer to external material. On top of that, for the third time, Minimalist has provided you with something in the other thread to respond to, which you have ignored, and continue to ignore.
Not blown away by your revised reasons, dickhead. Anything else?
