Ben Shapiro vs Neil deGrasse Tyson: The WAR Over Transgender Issues

[Thumpalumpacus]

The basis of metaethical objectivity is not in the number of the frogs, but in that the truth making property is the number of frogs whatever that number is.  As opposed to some other possible or actual fact about other things, specifically individual predispositions in subjectivism and societal constructs in relativism.  

If we're both pointing at frogs, we're both objectivists even if we both miscount the frogs.  To subjectivists and relativists, the number of frogs is irrelevant to the question of how many frogs are on the log.  Get it?

In this context objectivity means not appealing to opinion. Show me a moral stance that doesn't appeal to personal feelz. I'll wait.