Ben Shapiro vs Neil deGrasse Tyson: The WAR Over Transgender Issues

[Thumpalumpacus]

 The mere existence of moral assertions like these logically demonstrates that the statement "all moral claims are subjective" is false.  Empirically speaking, such assertions and rationales do exist.  If we trust in critical theories a great deal more than just the ones that express themselves as such.  You, we, apparently, just think they're wrong.  Wrong...by what?

Who is judging, and by what standard? Sure people hold individual rationales. What makes one rationale more right or wrong than others? You were an infantryman. How did you justify your use of force, and what differentiates you killing a Serbian from any other gunshot death? Can you do that and support your argument for objective morality without appealing to relativism or subjectivism?

A person might think that only one thing matters in moral statements or they may be a value pluralist.

And how is that not an appeal to subjectivism and an abnegation of objective morality?