RE: Anyone else feel how Christian biased history taught at school is?
January 31, 2012 at 1:58 am
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2012 at 1:59 am by Cosmic Ape.)
(January 31, 2012 at 12:28 am)Godschild Wrote:(January 30, 2012 at 3:45 am)Chuck Wrote:(January 30, 2012 at 12:06 am)Minimalist Wrote: For once I agree with you, G-C.
Red-letter Day eh?
The devil is in the details, min. Undoubtedly his history didn't say anything about what a crock of shit christainity had been in each of the eras he mentioned, nor does it contain any era or region about which christainity has nothing to say.
You want a biased history and that is not what history is about. We learn what happened in the past and then it's up to us to decide if it was good, bad or otherwise. History teachers and professors are to present history as it took place, they should never place an opinion about it's effect one way or the other, unless asked, that's what debates are for.
Wrong, history is ridden with alterations and interpretations. Havn't you heard the saying The Winners of the Wars wrote the history of their enemies and the events that took place, even more evident in your religion since they were going to make the bible much bigger but weeded out the stories they didnt want in the bible, had it of been different people it would've probably looked different.
It feels like I lose an IQ point every time you type something or I see that bastardized version of Pascals Wager in your sig as if you fucking scare Atheists with your eternal torture fantasy.
