Knowing everything and allowing evil

[Abracadabra]

---

Jesus taught the exact opposite moral values that had been taught in the Torah. He renounced the idea of judging others. He renounced the stoning of sinners. He renounced the seeking of revenge as in an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, and instead he taught people to forgive each other and to turn the other cheek.

Negatron. Much of the nastiest shit in christian myth comes directly from the mouth of this particular babe. He didn't renounce the stoning of sinners, he reserved the responsibility for himself (he without sin). He renounced the human drive for revenge, instead reserving it, again, for himself, in any sort of cosmic judgement, or end of days scenario. Turning the other cheek does nothing but to promote wickedness and suffering, as removing the consequences of those actions as undertaken by human beings is to remove the only deterrent we have available to us.

He's still the same fuzzy thinking desert god.

On the other hand, I completely agree that jesus was a patsy. Of course, he would have been wouldn't he. He was created as a scapegoat, to be tortured in our stead. He was always going to be a patsy, just another unacceptable and sick piece of this particular myth.

---

You're referring to the Christian lies. Jesus didn't go around demanding that everyone worship and obey him lest he personally stone them to death.

The Christians created that monster.

Moreover, once you recognize and realize that Jesus was not the divine son of God that these fables claim, it should suddenly also become apparent that there is no need to hold Jesus to ever single verbatim word that was shoved into his dead mouth by the authors of these rumors.

Suddenly you realize that you need to "read between the lines", to try to figure out what this person might have actually stood for in spite of all the erroneous claims that these rumors attempt to shove onto him.

On moment they claim that Jesus himself said that he will not judge anyone for not believing in his words. And the next moment they try to claim that to not believe in Jesus' words is grounds for certain condemnation.

Clearly these rumors are riddled with blatant falsehoods throughout. So you've got to realize that much of the claims being made by the rumors is clearly false.

But yes, I agree, if taken as infallible 'verbatim quotes' directly from the mouth of Jesus, then Jesus would not only be an unreasonable egotistical monster, but he would also be highly confused, inconsistent, and totally unsure of what he even wants from people.

He would not only be untrustworthy and potentially cruel, but he would also clearly be a lunatic who can't even think clearly or with any dependable consistency.

So yes, if the New Testament is just hearsay rumors (which it even confesses to be itself) then there's no need to hold Jesus responsible for all the superstitious rumors contained within it.