How can Christians not admit Christianity is all a pile of garbage when ...?

[chi pan]

So what about Uranium-lead dating? Which can have a much larger date range (with extremely high accuracy).

quote "Darwin was wrong about most all his theories according to all evolutionary scientists except for natural selection and the general sense of evolution" so by this statement you are ackowledging Darwin was correct about evolution? "he was wrong about a lot of things EXCEPT natural selection"? DNA was the final 'conclusive' proof that evolution is fact, many scientists had already accepted the validity of evolution. How do you explain that we share so much of our DNA with other animals and plants? DNA analysis can trace back many common ancestors between species and every organism on the planet share common genes. Humans believe it or not are actually 60% banana! yes we share 60% of our genes with the banana plant...isn't nature amazing?

Anyway, as I said in an earlier post, trying to argue science with a religious fundamentalist is absolutely pointless. No matter what I say you will not change your train of thought so I think its best I stop trying

Uranium dating is highly accurate? I think you must understand something quick. The bigger the scale, the less accurate it is. The smaller the scale, the more accurate it is. And what's wrong with it? It gives dates of millions of years to rocks that are 10 years old. Scientists say that it can't be used on rocks that are less than 6000 years old to explain these results but what if there is no rock older than that? The whole theory is out the window.

DNA does not prove evolution. What is the fact? It is the genetic code or blueprint to the animal. It does not prove evolution.

And I know plenty of science. It would be informative to see your facts but I can't force you. However, next thing you say about evolution without evidence will be ignored by me.