How can Christians not admit Christianity is all a pile of garbage when ...?

[chi pan]

Radio dating is all based on the geologic column that doesn't exist in one piece anywhere except in a textbook. This creates an assumption that they should use the dating methods that best fit the geologic column. They have never carbon dated a dinosaur. Why? Because they already assume it's millions of years old and carbon dating can only date up to 50,000 years theoretically. Also, they often repeat the dating until they get what they call an "accurate answer." its not consistant at all and as I learned in science "something can be consistant without being accurate, but nothing can be accurate without being consistant."

And Darwin's eloquent theory? Darwin was wrong about most all his theories according to all evolutionary scientists except for natural selection and the general sense of evolution. Any scientist will tell you that and say "but we've made so much progress since then with the discovery of DNA...." I don't see much evidence for the theory as far as the change of an animal to a completely different kind of animal. You can present your case though.

So, let's assess the situation. You're convinced that dating methods are too inaccurate to be relied upon, despite the success they have shown and the widespread use of such methods across a variety of fields. You would have us rely, instead, on a dusty old collection of fairy tales? Sorry Chip, no dice. Some of us have higher standards. You're unable to make your own case even if a person completely capitulates to your ignorance. All you have is a list of complaints. No explanations, no evidence, no credibility.

What exactly do you consider success? Dating a 10 year old rock to be millions of years old? I don't know how you can say its successful. Examples please?