The burden of proof relating to conciousness, free choice and rationality

[marx_2012]

"Aura imaging"? Oh please. What's next, Kirlian photography? There is NO credible evidence fort the existence of the human aura.Period.

The aura is the electromagnetic field around the body and the electromagnetic field around the body is the aura. The word aura has associated terms that you view as irrational but the two are synonymous!

WHAT? Are you REALLY that ignorant or just stupid?

Ad hominem my friend maybe when you move out of your parents basement you will gain the life experience needed to understand what Im saying!

You head your thread with;"the burden of proof-"which suggests you understand the meaning of the term.However,you have made it very clear you have no idea.

I challenge any man atheist, agnostic or theist to live 24 hours in which he believes intrinsically that free choice does not exist. When you can empirically experience the absolute denial of free will for 24 hours than maybe I will take your objections seriously! You can quote 'rational' terms and ideology but they cannot be empirically translated to any and all world views that your 'rational' mind can experience in the reality you perceive. Also you forget that the perception of reality depends on the nature of choice, choosing whether to look deep into reality in the flawed perception that you have, or mealy reassign yourself to the house cleaner that was clearly your destiny!
(No offence just the ad hominem that you said earlier fecked me off abit)

Non sequtior,action does not imply (suggest) or infer(prove) either free will or choice.

You are trying to separate the actions of atomic, molecular (etc.) movements from the reactions that are necessarily going to occur in the scientific paradigm! How is that a Non sequtior!?

So far,all I see is another airheaded new age crackpot.

So far all I can see is the pathetic lapdog of a follower of science and philosophy, by a person that has no knowledge of either or!