RE: God heals through modern medicine?
March 16, 2012 at 3:47 am
(This post was last modified: March 16, 2012 at 3:51 am by genkaus.)
(March 15, 2012 at 11:16 pm)Undeceived Wrote: 1. Do people expect God to clean up every mistake of ours? Most amputees are result of direct or indirect sin. Our body's frailty and imperfection is a result of original sin.
A fine example of blaming the victim. And I guess the altar boys wanted the priest's "holy spirit" to enter them?
What is important is not whether it was the result of a sin or not, what's important is if it was the result of their sin. But that wouldn't bother you Christians so much, since you love scapegoating others for your faults.s
(March 15, 2012 at 11:16 pm)Undeceived Wrote: 2. We're closer to God when we're weak. Most people admit they are changed for the better after or during a calamity.
A religion that glorifies mediocrity and weakness would be espoused by the mediocre and the weak. Q.E.D.
(March 15, 2012 at 11:16 pm)Undeceived Wrote: 3. The afterlife matters more than this one. Some amputees inspire people or could if they made the effort to. They accomplish a purpose they wouldn't have without their disability.
And argument expected from a religion that seeks death to all. Yours is a philosophy of death - not of life.
(March 15, 2012 at 11:16 pm)Undeceived Wrote: 4. We'd be irresponsible if our limbs regenerated freely. Kids might be more likely to go to war or jump off roofs for fun. Admit it, you'd at least cut your finger to try it out.
Ofcourse, we would.
Like how we know our hair would grow back - so we spend our days tearing them out?
Or how we know that our body would regenerate blood - so we spend our time cutting and bleeding ourselves? Women have even turned it into a ritual. Bleeding themselves for the fun of it a few days every month.
(March 15, 2012 at 11:16 pm)Undeceived Wrote: 5. Maybe God has given us multiple opportunities for a scientific breakthrough... and we failed by aborting 1.5 billion babies in the last 60 years. Imagine if one had the cure for cancer too.
He is a moron if he gave the opportunity to a baby he knew was going to get aborted.
(March 16, 2012 at 1:48 am)Undeceived Wrote: Your article says that adult stem cells are more likely to have abnormalities, but what is the whole point of research? To cure the person. Meaning, embryonic stem cells have better turnouts in labs but, according to my article, not in the person who needs the cure: "There are no rejection reactions, because the cells are from the same body." So adult stem cells have been more successful in the real world where it matters.
No, you moron. Stem sells are not used to develop a cure for the person they were taken from. They are used to cure someone else. Otherwise, it'd be like transfusing the person with his own blood.
