Are Atheists less Homophobic?

[kılıç_mehmet]

You can assert that "its an abomination against nature", but I don't see Nature sticking its hand up and tells us that it loathes anything.

Well, I'm looking beyond the fact that people are gay, but two people of the same-sex having the ability to procreate somehow outside the only way it can happen sounds pretty much like an abomination of nature to me.

I have no interest in debating someone who simply refuses to read the study already quoted.

Give me the damn study then. I'll read it and make up my own mind.

Assert Assert Assert
Fail to Produce contrary evidence
Assert.
Assert a bit more.
Assert Evidence must be wrong.
Fail to produce evidence why it must be wrong.
Dribble.

You think you can break my with your fancy, big words, friend?
Assertion. I make no assertions. The reason why I can't produce any studies here, is because they haven't probably been made. But I talk of common sense.
The common sense that works in this world.

You want to anthropomorphise nature and speak for it, why don't you call on a God instead. That way you can feel like you have a reason, even a fake one.

I don't have to speak for nature. Nature speaks for itself.
And it decrees that children can only be born from the sperm of a male, the egg and womb of a female. Is this so hard to comprehend?
Why do you insist on showing the abnormal as "normal"?

Seriously.. your entire point is about children is that they might ask questions? So what? They ask, its answered, problem solved.

And what about the social problems they'll probably face?
The reason they'll probably never speak of their parents to any of their friends?
I'm fairly certain that children and even adults would be reluctant to tell someone else that their parents are two guys, or two gals.
You're simply talking of the impossible.
I'm still waiting for the so-called study you have to show for it.

Fortunately, the real abomination, are those who still claw feebly to dark age prejudice, causing fear and emotional pain to other people on a irrational basis. I would say the more love in the world the better, and I would say that a gay family is better for a child than another bed in an orphanage.

And I think different, a kid in an orphanage would have less to be ashamed about than a child with homosexual parents.
And hell, if I were that kid, I certainly would maintain that I'm an orphan, that I have no parents. Because gays simply cannot become "parents" in the usual sense of the word. I think that the reason they want to adopt children is what I mentioned above, they need a sense of belonging, and they simply use children for their own insecurities, as pets, nothing more.
they feed them, they clothe them, they give them money, they send them to school, they probably buy them whatever they want and spoil them so they don't try to slip away from the family they'll sooner or later to find out and identify as what the rest of society identifies them as.

I have to agree with my Theist friend with the unpronounceable name, even though he probably prays to the wrong invisible man in the sky.

It's very simple: love is evil when the body parts are similar.

Family is a social construct, and must abide by the social boundaries it's set in. Gays try to stretch these for their own selfish needs, and use children for their means, and love has nothing to do with it.

It does not, like if there is *love* in an incestious relationship, and those two siblings, or whatever pairings you choose, want to get married, adopt or give birth to their own children, what exactly would you suggest that should be done, my sarcastic friend?