(August 12, 2009 at 5:56 pm)Jon Paul Wrote:(August 12, 2009 at 5:35 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: What I actually said was, "No he's not ... it doesn't matter in the slightest what the solipsist claims (we all know that making a claim means sod all unless it's supported by evidence), this is about a real comparison." so I gave more information than you cared to admit I did and the reasoning I gave was entirely valid!You have still not demonstrated that there is less complexity in realism than in solipsism, simply because your allegory does not hold true of solipsism (as Rizomorph rightly pointed out).
Solipsism is a bankrupt philosophy just like metaphysics.
Look moron ... I don't need to, I reject solipsism as part of this debate (concerning the complexity of reality vs virtual) and I'm not using fucking allegory! If you want allegory here you go ... it's like saying that cheese proves trees are green! Solipsism has SOD ALL to do with the concept under discussion and just claiming it does makes no difference therefore I DO NOT HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE STUPIDITY OF SOLIPSISM!!!!!!
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
