The philsophical zombie is an inconherent concept as I've already said. If they're indistingusible then they'll have all the same beliefs and responses and their brain will behave indentically - if they're indeed really behaviorally indistingusible. Hence they are conscious in the same sense we are. So their entire concept is entirely incoherent.
Solipsism is the notion of there being no other mind other than one's own. But this is false is p-zeds are false because if others aren't p-zeds then they have their own consciousness, so solipsism is false.
Obviously our conclusions come down to our own beliefs. We can only know what we know. This is extremely obvious by definition. We are subjective minds, our beliefs are based on evidence or lack thereof. What is your point?
EvF
Solipsism is the notion of there being no other mind other than one's own. But this is false is p-zeds are false because if others aren't p-zeds then they have their own consciousness, so solipsism is false.
Obviously our conclusions come down to our own beliefs. We can only know what we know. This is extremely obvious by definition. We are subjective minds, our beliefs are based on evidence or lack thereof. What is your point?
EvF
