If other 'things' don't exist either, thats irrelevant and semantic. It makes so actual difference your just using words there.
The point is I have explained why others are more likely to be conscious just as oneself is, than not be. Because p-zeds are incoherent, so whether other 'things' are real or unreal too (which is enitrely irelevant and semantic, what are you on about? Where is the actual difference in experience?) there can be no p-zeds so others are almost certaintly as conscious in the same sense that I know 'I' am.
EvF
The point is I have explained why others are more likely to be conscious just as oneself is, than not be. Because p-zeds are incoherent, so whether other 'things' are real or unreal too (which is enitrely irelevant and semantic, what are you on about? Where is the actual difference in experience?) there can be no p-zeds so others are almost certaintly as conscious in the same sense that I know 'I' am.
EvF