Morality

[Drich]

You seem to be missing a bit of the equation. In that God's righteousness is not/Can not be obtained by our efforts. It is a gift given to all who believe in the atoning sacrifice of Christ.

That means righteousness is still obtainable even if you lie to the German officer to save your friend/family.

So after saving your god's chosen people, I have to ask forgiveness for not telling the truth?? And only then do I get the righteousness? I often lied to my grandmother as a kid. I would tell her that I was going to the arcade when I was really going to play football because she was terrified that I would get seriously hurt playing that sport. There was no malicious intent in that lie ... therefore there is no sin, unrighteousness, etc etc.

If you and/or your god think there is, that's your business, but I know many Christians who do not think the way you do. Are you a true Christian or are they?

... let me just guess ...

You guys twist things to suit your own arguments or if you prefer a formal evaluation you have created a straw man fallacy rather than address the biblical definitions I have post at least a dozen times.

Sin is anything not in the Expressed will of God

Evil is a malicious intent to commit sin

Not all sin is evil but all evil is sin.

---

People,

A link below of a definition in Oxford Dictionaries website I guess.

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition...q=morality

Do you not understand the point or purpose of this thread?

You can not take a popular understanding or concept and directly compare it to the standard of God. Why because it would be a dishonest comparison.

If the Standard of God has been known for 1000's of years then it would not be difficult to change the standard to suit a sense of self righteousness to persecute God.

If you are going to honestly compare a 2000+ year old understanding of God then you have to use the same comparative standard of morality.