(April 16, 2012 at 5:21 pm)genkaus Wrote:(April 16, 2012 at 3:56 pm)Drich Wrote: Yes, shell fish, blood sausage, bacon, ham, hamburger, unshelled fish.. what else you got?
You weren't allowed to before. It seems that your god's morality does change.
(April 16, 2012 at 3:56 pm)Drich Wrote: Because of "C" Only a fool judges another outside of his standard of living by his standard of living. My efforts are focused on those who truly seek an honest understanding. In that their "standard" of morality is not a standard at all. but a variable based on time culture and perspective.
A standard of living is not a standard of morality. Your god's standard of morality is clearly inferior to modern man's.
(April 16, 2012 at 3:56 pm)Drich Wrote: Which brings up the bigger question: So how can anyone; let alone God, be judged by what is right today in this part of the world, when tomorrow or just a few thousand miles away all of that can change? In that situation who would be the one to correctly judge God? the guys that says it is ok kill gay people in an earth quake or the guy praying for his gay brother in said quake? That is why if you are to judge God then it has to be by an absolute standard, like the one Given in the bible.
Because a) Any judgment being passed and accepted is consented to by both parties and b) morality given in the bible is anything but absolute.
(April 16, 2012 at 3:56 pm)Drich Wrote: I honestly don't think you know what is being discussed. Perhaps if you asked a few more questions i could help provide you with a better idea of what is going on.
Sure I do. You are providing biblical redefinitions of words such as morality and righteousness according to your subjective interpretation of the bible while completely ignoring their objectively established and accepted meanings, all the while never acknowledging the distinction between the two and therefore laying the basis for future "fallacies of equivocation" whenever morality would be discussed.
I'm correcting you.
