RE: Chat with a creationist
May 5, 2012 at 5:02 pm
(This post was last modified: May 5, 2012 at 5:08 pm by DeeTee.)
Here is a link to the Khirbet Qeiyafa home page
http://qeiyafa.huji.ac.il/
People who do not want the Bible shown to be true love to sit in their chairs and just deny. They refuse to present any evidence to the contrary as it is easier to deny than do their own work.
Here is a link to the ostracon page
http://qeiyafa.huji.ac.il/ostracon.asp
I have heard about this discovery but have not had the time to investigate more fully but I have no problem with it being an example of 10th century BC work. Seems that I. finkelstein has written on the topic as well and his position is of no surprise because he needs to protect his low chronology. If the discovery stands it destroys Finkelstein's theory.
http://zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com/...l-qeiyafa/
http://qeiyafa.huji.ac.il/
People who do not want the Bible shown to be true love to sit in their chairs and just deny. They refuse to present any evidence to the contrary as it is easier to deny than do their own work.
Here is a link to the ostracon page
http://qeiyafa.huji.ac.il/ostracon.asp
I have heard about this discovery but have not had the time to investigate more fully but I have no problem with it being an example of 10th century BC work. Seems that I. finkelstein has written on the topic as well and his position is of no surprise because he needs to protect his low chronology. If the discovery stands it destroys Finkelstein's theory.
http://zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com/...l-qeiyafa/
