RE: Another argument for existence of God!
May 23, 2012 at 9:46 am
(This post was last modified: May 23, 2012 at 9:47 am by NoMoreFaith.)
(May 23, 2012 at 9:22 am)jain.rahul Wrote: "Only randomness can be there without intelligence"
Declaration 1 is false which makes the argument irrelevant.
We observe order in things without intelligence ALL the time. Drop a stone in water and watch ordered concentric circles, roll a ball down a hill, and measure the acceleration.
If you argue that these things are ordered only because of God, then you make the a priori assumption he exists, in order to prove he exists.
The argument would then read,
"Order only exists because of God, therefore God exists".
Obviously stupid because you can make an declaration about anything for equal validity.
"Order only exists because of my invisible unicorn, therefore my invisible unicorn exists."
Self-authenticating private evidence is useless, because it is indistinguishable from the illusion of it. ― Kel, Kelosophy Blog
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
