That argument implodes in on itself.
If only randomness can exist without a creator, then what created the creator? Is the creator randomness?
Also, the Universe is not orderly. Sure, you could find reasons to support an orderly Universe, but you could find far more evidence pointing towards chaos. There is nothing orderly about a blackhole. There is nothing orderly about quantum mechanics. If the Universe was so orderly, I think we would have a unified theory of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics by now.
The "fine-tuning" and "watch-maker" analogies are thoroughly debunked already.
You should grant their premise and pose the question:
What is the justification for your premise leading to a SINGLE creator?
If only randomness can exist without a creator, then what created the creator? Is the creator randomness?
Also, the Universe is not orderly. Sure, you could find reasons to support an orderly Universe, but you could find far more evidence pointing towards chaos. There is nothing orderly about a blackhole. There is nothing orderly about quantum mechanics. If the Universe was so orderly, I think we would have a unified theory of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics by now.
The "fine-tuning" and "watch-maker" analogies are thoroughly debunked already.
You should grant their premise and pose the question:
What is the justification for your premise leading to a SINGLE creator?
"We are all connected; To each other, biologically. To the earth, chemically. To the rest of the universe atomically.”
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
-Neil deGrasse Tyson