(May 23, 2012 at 9:22 am)jain.rahul Wrote: Hello,
I was given an argument for existence of God. The statement goes something like this.
"Only randomness can be there without intelligence, consciousness but universe is not in a random design nor it is working randomly. Therefore it requires an intelligent designer"
What type of argument is this, and how can I refute it?
As far as I can see, its another Teleological argument. What's a good counter for this one?
The child's version is "If ifs and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a party"